Review: ‘Blade Runner 2049’ is perfect


10/10 Ana Stelline (Carla Juri) makes the best memory implants in the business.

The classic 1982 film “Blade Runner,” which is set in 2019, hinges on the implementation of implants into replicants, synthetic humans designed for military and slave labor. Artificial memories allow replicants to better mimic human behavior but led to them developing emotions and working toward their own rights.

After an uprising in 2022, their production was banned, and the Tyrell Corporation, which made its fortune building replicants, went out of business. Since then, business mogul Niander Wallace (Jared Leto) adapted the synthesis technology for agriculture, which more or less saved the world. In 2036, he bullies lawmakers into allowing the production and sale of replicants once more, some of whom still use memory implants.

In “Blade Runner 2049,” Stelline tells Officer K (Ryan Gosling) that people think details are what makes a memory powerful, but that’s not how the mind works. What makes a memory powerful is how it makes you feel when you remember it.

How true of film, as well.

“Blade Runner 2049” is difficult to stay awake through. It’s 163 minutes long, quiet as the grave for long stretches, visually dark and potentially difficult to access without having seen — not just seen, but really understood — the first film.

How is it perfect, then?

It just is.

The creative team has put a lot of thought into how much information viewers should have going in. If you’ve seen the original and the shorts and still don’t know exactly what “2049” is about, you’re in exactly the right place.

Despite “Blade Runner” being rigidly closed to a sequel, writers Michael Green and Hampton Francher, the latter of whom wrote the original, found a way to not only continue its story but expand on its themes. In this era of nostalgia-driven “reboots” that are part sequel and part remake, “2049” should be a beacon of how to do this right. It expertly recreates moments from the first movie in completely new contexts, making something unique and nostalgic at the same time.

Even the weakest films from director Denis Villeneuve (“Sicario,” “Arrival”) put shame to other directors’ greatest triumphs, and frequent collaborator Roger Deakins (“No Country for Old Men,” “The Shawshank Redemption”) is probably the greatest cinematographer who ever lived. Together, they create a visual masterpiece of backlit silhouettes.

There are plenty of reasons to dislike “Blade Runner 2049.” It’s slow and not flashy at all. I’d actually prefer this movie with an intermission, because of both the length and the amount of attention it demands throughout. Go see it anyway. Go see it in the biggest, loudest format you have access to, and bring an open mind.

Villeneuve is a genius at expressing different, complementary themes through his visuals and his plots, respectively, though it sometimes takes some abstract thinking to follow. Much of the focus in “2049” is on recreating the unique sci-fi noir atmosphere that made the first movie so famous. There’s a burning anticipation baked into most of the shots, which is enhanced by their duration. Even two and a half hours in, the eternal shots keep you on the edge of your seat, wondering what will happen next.

In a lot of ways, it’s a purer form of filmmaking because it’s not about the details.

It’s about how it makes you feel when you watch it.

For more, check out Leopold Knopp’s movie blog at